A Call to Amend the Constitution and Reverse Citizens United

Dave Lefcourt, Opednews, 01-19-2012

http://www.opednews.com/articles/A-Call-to-Amend-the-Consti-by-Dave-Lefcourt-120119-973.html

This morning I attended a rally called, “Take Back Democracy, End Corporate Rule” in Annapolis, Maryland.

It was sponsored by “Public Citizen” and a number of other state, local and county groups.

The focus was “to show support for a Maryland State Resolution calling for a constitutional amendment” to overturn “Citizens United”.

It wasn’t a huge public gathering, as these things go, with just a few speakers and lasting only some 30 minutes on a cold raw day, but it was significant i.e. it displayed a copy of the letter to be sent to the U.S. Congress and signed by the members of the Maryland General Assembly.

 Herewith is that letter:

We the undersigned members of the Maryland General Assembly call upon you to pass a constitutional amendment to reverse the United States Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), which declared that corporations enjoy the First Amendment political rights of the people and toppled dozens of state and federal laws and many decades of judicial precedent preventing corporations (and unions) from spending corporate (and union) treasury funds in political campaigns.

 

This radical departure from judicial precedent and democratic values has already brought a torrent of corporate money directly, much of it secret, into American politics, fundamentally distorting public elections and campaigns for public office. The decision poses a direct and dramatic threat to government “of the people, by the people and for the people”.

By bringing corporations into the heart of the political process, Citizens United changes the character of democracy. For-profit corporations (except benefit corporations) are legally bound to pursue the maximization of profits and economic advantage in all their endeavors. This is one reason why most United States Supreme Court Justices, from Chief Justice John Marshall to Chief Justice William Rehnquist to Justice Byron White to the four dissenting justices in Citizens United v. FEC, have rejected the claim that corporations have political rights.

Corporations enjoy special state-conferred economic and legal advantages not enjoyed by natural persons, including limited liability of the shareholders, perpetual life of the corporation itself, and favorable treatment of the accumulation and distribution of assets. These advantages permit corporations to amass vast sums of money that are spent properly for economic purposes but not for the purposes of intervening in democratic politics and entrenching corporate power.

Article V of the United States Constitution empowers the people, the states and the Congress to use the constitutional amending process to protect republican self-government. This power has repeatedly been used by the people when the Supreme Court has undermined the progress of popular democracy.

As members of the Maryland General Assembly, we sharply disagree with the majority decision in Citizens United v. Federal election Commission and call upon the United States Congress to propose and send to the states for ratification as soon as practicable a constitutional amendment to reverse this decision and restore fair elections and democratic sovereignty to the states and to the people.

Needless to say, if members of the U.S. Congress fail to act responsibly (as requested by this letter) and forward an amendment to the Constitution for the states to ratify, the legislatures of 34 states could act independently and pass resolutions in their respective states calling for an amendment to the Constitution.

Ending the corporate takeover of our electoral process and repeal of Citizens United by a constitutional amendment is absolutely necessary to restore our democracy.


1 comment on this postSubmit yours
  1. I agree with this – what kind of crazy person would think that a company is equal to a Person with regards to giving money to a candidate of their choice. They are not equal unless the person is wealthy, so the person is at a disadvantage to the company.
    Besides all the other problems mentioned.

Submit your comment

Please enter your name

Please enter a valid email address

Please enter your message

The Healers Journal © 2014 All Rights Reserved